Sunday, March 18, 2012

Chapter 3: The Energy Theory of Cooking


Chapter 3: The Energy Theory of Cooking
Enter Junk Food
            In this chapter, Wrangham presents arguments based on nutritional science how cooking facilitates food digestion (I think he may be getting redundant at this point….). In summary, he states that although cooking may have adverse effects on the nutritional content of food (energy losses through drippings, the production of inedible compounds and a reduction in vitamins) it does make what nutrients remain easier to digest by breaking down the cell walls or plant matter and tenderizing meats (Wrangham, 2009). He asserts, at the end of the chapter, that because female members of the genius Homo cooked and could therefore get more nutrients, they had healthier babies, higher reproductive success and passed on more genes than ancient raw-foodists.
            The importance of consuming high-nutrition foods during pregnancy is clear. But in this day and age it may be taken too far.  New research done by the Royal Veterinary College of London suggests that food preferences can be passed down from mother to unborn child, especially those for high calorie, high sugar and high cholesterol foods. Their research found that rats that ate diets high in fat, salt and sugar while pregnant produced offspring who were more likely to prefer the same diet as opposed to regular feed (Boyal et al., 2008). Another study from the Journal of Physiology indicated that these young rats bodies’ retained negative effects to their metabolism long past their junk food filled-adolescence (Science Daily, 2008).
            Are there similarities between pregnant women and pregnant rats? Research shows that the heavier a woman became during pregnancy the more likely she was to have an obese child (Oken et al., 2008).  The same study shows the female children shows signs of high levels of leptin –the hormone that induces appetite, making them more susceptible to over eating.  Therefore, nutritionist Dr. Stephanie Bayol states: “We always say 'you are what you eat'. In fact, it may also be true that 'you are what your mother ate.' This does not mean that obesity and poor health is inevitable and it is important that we take care of ourselves and live a healthy lifestyle. But it does mean that mothers must eat responsibly whilst pregnant" (Science Daily, 2008).
            Wrangham states that passing nutrition and a preference for cooked food from mother to child with crucial in the success of our early ancestors (Wrangham, 2009). I find it interesting that now the same trend, plus Twinkies, little Debbies’ and Frittos, may again affect our evolutionary success. As obesity and related diseases occur with increasing frequency within the industrialized world, it will interesting to see if society’s attention switches from a fixation on slim-cut jeans, to addressing the genes themselves.

References:
Bayol S, Simbi B, Bertrand, and Stickland N. 2008. Offspring from mothers fed a "junk food" diet in pregnancy and lactation exhibit exacerbated adiposity which is more pronounced in females. The Journal of Physiology. 586:3219-3230.
Oken E, Taveras E, Kleinman, K, Rich-Edwards, J and Gillam M. 2008. Gestational weight gain and child adiposity at age 3 years.  American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 196:322.
Wrangham, R. 2009. Catching fire: how cooking made us human. New York: Basics Books.

--- 2008. Poor Diet During Pregnancy May Have Long Term Impact On Child's Health, Study Suggests. Science Daily. Available online at: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080630200951.htm


No comments:

Post a Comment